Tuesday, May 5, 2009
International Day of the Midwife
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Monday, May 4, 2009
Grassroots Network: M.O.M. Campaign: midwives and health care reform
Congress has laid out an ambitious timeline for achieving health care reform this year. Midwives and consumers are mobilizing quickly to take advantage of this unprecedented opportunity and to defend against any threats to accessing midwifery care.
Midwives Organizing for Mothers (M.O.M.) is a new national campaign to raise awareness and secure a place for Certified Professional Midwives in our health care system. Spearheaded by the National Association of Certified Professional Midwives (NACPM), the M.O.M. Campaign Steering Committee includes the Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA), the North American Registry of Midwives (NARM), the Midwifery Education Accreditation Council (MEAC), Citizens for Midwifery (CfM) and the International Center for Traditional Childbearing (ICTC).
CfM's President, Susan Hodges, and Vice President, Nasima Pfaffl, are designated members of the M.O.M Campaign Steering Committee representing Citizens for Midwifery. They will be heading to Washington DC, along with the other Steering Committee members from NACPM, NARM, MEAC and MANA, to meet on May 4-5 to fine-tune our campaign strategies and meet with various legislators and congressional committee members.
SAVE THE DATE:
Join the leaders of this initiative for a conference call Webinar on Thursday, May 7th at 8 p.m. EST to find out more about the M.O.M Campaign and how you can participate! Details to follow early next week; this will be an information call rather than a discussion. And, be ready for Action Alerts!
Sincerely,
Susan Hodges "gatekeeper"
Grassroots Network: Sign AABC letter to Support Birth Centers
You can help support birth centers one of maternity care choices that should be widely available to all women simply by signing an on-line letter.
The American Association of Birth Centers (AABC) is asking for your help.
Rep. Susan Davis (D., CA) will soon introduce a bill to include birth centers as eligible providers for Medicaid payment. To clarify, when a Medicaid-covered birth takes place in a hospital, the doctor gets paid, and the hospital is paid too -- a facility fee. A judge recently ruled that Medicaid may not pay the 43 birth centers in Texas, because birth centers are not specifically listed in the federal statute for Medicaid. This ruling would apply nationally. But hospitals can still get paid if women who are Medicaid recipients give birth in hospitals. When birth centers are not reimbursed for a facility fee, they cannot survive economically, and Medicaid-eligible women are denied this excellent (and cost-saving) choice.
If you think this is wrong and bad public policy, please sign the AABC letter. The letter supports enactment of legislation, i.e. Rep. Davis' bill, that would correct this inequity.
Please pass this on to everyone you know and all birth-related or women's health elists that you belong to so others can sign too. PLEASE both sign and pass it on. AABC's goal is 1,000 signatures in the next week.
To sign the letter go here.
Sincerely,
Susan Hodges, "gatekeeper"
Friday, May 1, 2009
Celebrate!
May 9th kicks off the first International Birth Wisdom Week (the women at Independent Childbirth are planning an exciting cyber birth expo! Make sure to check their blog for updates). This is an exciting event and I will be posting more about it, so stay tuned!
May is International Doula Month too! DONA International offers these ideas of how to celebrate:
- Write an article for a local publication or send a press release to your local media.
- Host a free doula info night at a library or community center to let parents know about your services, which might also be a great reason for your local press to do a story on doulas.
- Have a movie night for parents and/or doulas. Show the latest movies, such as "Orgasmic Birth," "The Business of Being Born" or "Pregnant in America," or revisit some of the classics.
- Create a birthing circle where women can share their birth stories to support each other and/or heal from their birth trauma.
- Organize a networking day for local doulas to meet, network and support each other with new ideas and co-opetition.
- Host an at-home spa party for local doulas.
- Put together info packages that hospitals and birth centers can hand out to expectant parents and/or laboring mothers with suggestions for position changes and comfort measures.
And, of course, Mother's Day is recognized on May 10th! Enjoy all the celebrations!
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
New Research Blog
I've previously mentioned two great posts by Amy:
Rotating Theories of the Increasing C-section Rate: Vitamin D Edition
Why the largest study of planned home births won’t sway ACOG
Two more good ones:
Do We Need a Cochrane Review to Tell Us that Women Should Move in Labor?
NICUs: If We Build It, They Will Come?
I love her style and look forward to following this new blog!
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Grassroots Network: Birth Survey reviews now available!
Dear Friends,
The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) has just announced: The Birth Survey Now Offers Access to Reviews of Local Maternity Care Providers and Facilities.
Many of you already know about The Birth Survey, part of the Transparency in Maternity Care Project of the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services CIMS). The Birth Survey involves an "an on-going online consumer survey that asks women to provide feedback about their pregnancy and birth care specific to the particular doctor, midwife, hospital or birth center that served them." The Birth Survey has been collecting these surveys, and now has these reviews available on-line, for reviews from across the country!
Read the informative press release below, or find it and more information about the Birth Survey and the rest of the Transparency in Maternity Care Project here.
Sincerely,
Susan Hodges, "gatekeeper"
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Denna Suko, Executive Director
Coalition for Improving Maternity Services
Tel: 919.863.9482
dsuko@motherfriendl
Raleigh, NC (April 28th, 2009)-CIMS, the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services, a group working toward transparency in maternity care, today announced that consumer survey results rating health care providers and birth facilities are now available online.
The CIMS Transparency in Maternity Care Project: The Birth Survey is the first ever consumer ratings website dedicated solely to providing feedback on obstetricians, midwives, hospitals, birth centers, and home birth services. The consumer reviews include overall ratings and recommendations for birth facilities and care providers, and also a seven-item set of questions on providers' interpersonal and communication skills, facility intervention rates, and information on finding good care. A national average of ratings is also displayed to provide comparison with individual ratings.
"While consumers have long been sharing information online about products and services, more data was available for the purchase of a digital camera than had ever been available to women as consumers of maternity care. The Birth Survey directly addresses that information deficit," said Robin Elise Weiss, LCCE, author of The Complete Illustrated Guide to Pregnancy and member of The Birth Survey Committee.
The Birth Survey is a user-friendly, free Website where mothers who have given birth within the last three years can provide detailed, anonymous feedback about their experiences. The survey questions are based upon the Mother Friendly Childbirth Initiative, an evidence-based model of high quality maternity care. Additionally, the interpersonal and communication questions are based upon an AHRQ survey, which represents a well known set of questions currently used by doctors and hospitals.
More than 17,500 ratings for providers and 6,500 ratings for facilities have been submitted since the national launch in August 2008. Now, parents-to-be can retrieve the pooled reporting on local providers and facilities.
The national averages of the consumer feedback collected indicate that midwives were rated more highly than the physicians. For example, 58 percent of respondents would recommend their doctors to family and friends, compared to 90 percent who would recommend their midwives. Across all providers, 77 percent of women reported that they had their questions answered completely, and 73 percent felt they were as free as they wanted to be in making their own decisions about their care. Averages, however, varied widely between individual providers.
The Website ratings pages also provide links to hospital and birth center obstetric intervention rates, such as c-section, for facilities in nine states. This information is part of The Birth Survey's nationwide campaign to make facility-level intervention data available to the public. This kind of public reporting supports informed choice
and fosters transparency, which improves outcomes.
Consistent with a new series of government Public Service announcements that encourage consumers to get involved in their health care and ask questions of their care providers, The Birth Survey offers links to information on how to choose and evaluate providers, including the "CIMS Ten Questions to Ask." B y offering more than a conventional five-star rating, The Birth Survey offers information that is vital for women to make more informed decisions.
"A woman who looks at a list of names from her insurance company is often choosing a provider on nothing but blind luck. Where and with whom to give birth are important health care decisions. Research shows that both provider and location have a significant impact on birth outcomes. CIMS wants expectant parents to ask questions of their providers and facilities, and have access to more information about their local options," said Elan McAllister, founder of Choices in Childbirth in New York City and Co-chair of the The Birth Survey committee.
The Birth Survey is an ongoing project. In the summer of 2009, free-text responses will be displayed on the website, and in 2010, detailed information on patients' experiences with prenatal, labor, birth and postpartum care will be added to the website as searchable custom reports.
###
For more about The Birth Survey, to view intervention data for each
state, the survey results, or to take the survey, log on to
http://www.thebirth
About the Transparency in Maternity Care Project: The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services CIMS) through the Transparency in Maternity Care Project developed The Birth Survey so families can share information, learn about the choices and birth experiences of others, and view data on hospital and birth center intervention rates and practices. It is also designed to help providers and facilities improve the quality and transparency of their care. At the heart of the project is an on-going online consumer survey that asks women to provide feedback about their pregnancy and birth care specific to the particular doctor, midwife, hospital or birth center that served them. Responses are made available online to other women in their community who are deciding where and with whom to birth. Paired with this experiential data, are official statistics from state departments- of-health listing obstetrical intervention rates at the facility level.
About the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services: The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) is a coalition of individuals and national organizations with concern for the care and well-being of mothers, babies, and families. Our mission is to promote a wellness model of maternity care that will improve birth outcomes and substantially reduce costs. This evidence-based mother-, baby-, and family-friendly model focuses on prevention and wellness as the alternatives to high-cost screening, diagnosis, and treatment programs. For more information, log on to http://www.motherfr
Denna L. Suko
Executive Director
Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS)
1500 Sunday Dr Ste 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: 919.863.9482
Fax: 919-787-4916
dsuko@motherfriendl
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Grassroots Network: PushNews: Flu and need for out-of-hospital midwives
The news of a pending flu epidemic is alarming. Even more so is the fact that national and state disaster preparedness plans have not given much attention to childbirth in the midst of any disaster, including an epidemic.
The Big Push has addressed this issue in a new "PushNews." You can read it here.
With health care reform around the corner, this is a great time to write letters to the editor, or op ed pieces for your local newspaper, and this is a newsworthy angle. Any positive mention of midwives (of any kind) in the newspaper is good! You can quote from the press release, and/or if you know a reporter at your local paper, you can give them a copy. When you write a letter to the editor, be sure to find out the word limit for your paper (so you can do any editing!). Find some "Tips for Writing Letters to the Editor" here.
The Big Push for Midwives is "a nationally coordinated campaign to advocate for regulation and licensure of Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs) in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico."
If you haven't already, to take a look at the Big Push website and you can sign up for PushAlerts here.
Sincerely,
Susan Hodges, "gatekeeper"
Grassroots Network: Petition: "Support Evidence Based Midwifery Education in the US"
You may have already seen this on other lists; if not, please read the note below and consider signing the petition. Citizens for Midwifery has endorsed NARM's statement, and nearly 2000 individuals have already signed on.
The CPM credential is the point; whether you acquire your skills, knowledge and experience through an accredited program or through other means (documented through the Portfolio Evaluation Process) does not make a difference, nor is one better or worse than the other. A CPM is a CPM.
In the end, as women and families, we need all the midwives we can get, in every setting, and women should be able to choose the provider and setting that is best for them. The ACNM has every right to make position statements about the certified nurse midwife credential, but should refrain from taking positions about other credentials and their requirements, especially when such a position creates barriers for qualified midwives to practice and women to access them.
Sincerely,
Susan Hodges, "gatekeeper"
From the North American Registry of Midwives (NARM):
Dear Friends-
A recently revised Position Statement from the American College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM) seeks to limit recognition of midwifery providers to those who have received their training through government accredited programs. The North American Registry of Midwives (NARM) oversees the credentialing of midwives who have received their training through time honored and evidenced based systems that emphasize clinical competency over all other criteria (Certified Professional Midwives-CPMs)
NARM has posted an online petition in an effort to organize our voices and convince the ACNM to reconsider its position on apprentice trained midwives. This letter seeks to unite US Midwifery under the common goal of providing women with access to the provider and setting of their choice for birth.
We ask that individuals as well as state and national midwifery and birth advocacy organizations sign this petition.
There are many great opportunities mounting to move midwifery forward on both the state and national level. We must stand together as a community of midwives if we are going to have a real voice for change in maternity care. Whether you are a CPM, CNM, a midwifery consumer, advocate, or none of the above, please go here
Respectfully,
The NARM Board of Directors
The Birth Survey Results are In!
A little more about the purpose of The Birth Survey:
"For years, consumers have enthusiastically shared online reviews of movies, restaurants, products and services, but readily available information about maternity care providers and birth settings was nearly unattainable--but no longer. The Birth Survey is now available to all women in the US who have given birth in the last three years. Women can now give consumer reviews of doctors, midwives, hospitals, and birth centers, learn about the choices and birth experiences of others, and view data on hospital and birth center standard practices and intervention rates."
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Monday, April 27, 2009
Grassroots Network: Action Alert: Help Birth Centers!
Dear Friends,
The American Association of Birth Centers is asking everyone to help with grassroots support in their efforts to get federal legislation that would include birth center facility fees for Medicaid reimbursement. Without this, many birth centers, especially those that serve many Medicaid clients, would have to close. While some state Medicaid programs have reimbursed birth centers in the past, more recently the federal government has taken actions to stop states from including this reimbursement because it is not specified in federal legislation. You can find more information about birth centers and the bill at "Materials to Help You Communicate with Your Legislators."
.
Please read the message below, which spells out exactly what is needed. All it will take on your part is a couple of phone calls to help make sure that freestanding birth centers can continue to offer women an excellent choice for maternity care.
Thanks for your help!
Susan Hodges, “gatekeeper”
From the American Association of Birth Centers:
How to Help AABC Lobby for the Birth Center Medicaid Bill
The American Association of Birthing Centers (AABC) is seeking federal legislation that would add freestanding birth centers to the list of health professionals and providers eligible for payment under the federal-state Medicaid program. Medicaid is the primary source of payment for maternity care services for low income women; in many states, nearly half of all pregnant women are Medicaid beneficiaries. The Federal law that lists all Medicaid-eligible providers is section 1905(a) of the Social Security Act. Although hospitals, physicians, nurse-midwives, clinics, and others are among those listed, birth centers are not. This means that birth centers cannot be reimbursed for the facility fees they charge, which are like hospital facility fees, but much less money.
Next week, AABC’s bill will be introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Susan Davis (D., CA) (San Diego). It will then be assigned a bill number and an official name. We will let you know when that happens, but don’t wait to make your calls. AABC is asking all birth professionals, birth advocates, and supporters of improving maternity care to help us lobby for this bill. Grassroots support phone calls to Congress is the single most important element in whether a bill like this becomes law.
Please help. It’s easy. (See #4 below for how to find out who your Congresspeople are.) Here’s all you have to do:
1.
2.
3.
- ·
how important this bill is to Medicaid mothers and babies,
- ·
how great birth center outcomes are, and
- ·
how important it is to keep birth centers as viable options for low income women.
http://www.birthcen
4.
6.
7.
Thanks so much for your help.
Friday, April 24, 2009
Language of Birth
The language used to describe pregnancy and childbirth reflects assumptions about women that set the stage for different styles of maternity care. Woman-centered terminology portrays women as active, healthy, and powerful, and labor as 'natural' and 'normal,' In this view, associated traditionally with the midwifery model, providers 'attend' women, 'assist' at births, and 'catch' babies. In contrast, some medical language depicts women as passive subjects, putting doctors in the role of 'managing labor' and 'delivering babies.' Medical terms such as 'failure to progress,' 'inadequate pelvis,' and 'incompetent cervix' imply that something is wrong with a woman's body. This influences how we see ourselves, how providers see us, and how the media portray birth.
On a related note, I've had the book Bearing Meaning: The Language of Birthon my Amazon wishlist for quite some time. I have a birthday coming up, so perhaps I'll finally get to read it! :)
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Happy Earth Day!
This phrase keeps turning around in my head today as I spent Earth Day outside with my two children and our friends. I wanted to share some quotes from the Midwifery Today book The Heart & Science of Homebirth (in the article "Remembering Why We are Midwives" by Judy Edmunds):
"...I believe in the beauty and dignity inherent in all women. I am awed by their strength and power and am fortunate to be able to attend births where these qualities are so clearly displayed. Having a share in drawing out that power, respecting that dignity and nurturing the spirit of courage is being privy to a bit of creation itself. It is an incredible privilege."
"Midwives try to convey these simple truths: Birth is not a clinical exercise. It is not a medical procedure. In nearly every instance, it should not be major surgery. Nor should it even routinely include minor surgery. Rather than being a time of weakness with beds, shots, fasting, IVs and wheelchairs, it is time of energy and strength. Raw power. Mightiness. Courage."
This is a beautiful summation. If more women and babies began their journeys together with this attitude towards birth behind them, perhaps we really would have peace on earth!
I also wanted to link to two great blog posts I read today. First, at Stand & Deliver, a review of the book Policing Pregnancy that includes a thought-provoking analysis of using the term "obstetric conflict" instead of "maternal-fetal conflict." Second, at The Unnecesarean a discussion about a new British study "Maternal Request Not Reason for Rising Cesarean Rate."
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Grassroots Network: New home birth study from the Netherlands
As many of you may have heard, a very large study of home birth in the Netherlands was just published last week. The abstract is below, as well as the link to the abstract on the website of BJOG (an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology). The study concludes that giving birth at home is as safe as hospital (if the birth is planned, with a well-trained midwife, and there is adequate transportation to and communication with medical services). It anticipates a similar study out of the UK that will be forthcoming. Mary Newburn, head of research and information at the National Childbirth Trust, commented that the study "makes a significant contribution to the growing body of reassuring evidence that suggests offering women a choice of place of birth is entirely appropriate."
Molly previously posted some additional links regarding this study. A comment to Rixa's blog included a link to a letter to the editor of the British Medical Journal from Madeleine Akrich, PhD and Bernard Bel, PhD, Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance), that included these comments:
"We do share Visser & Steegers' concern about high transfer rates in low-risk births. As suggested in their paper, bad rates point at the detrimental effect of discontinuity of care, rather than at unforeseen serious complications. In their words, "healthy pregnant women need care, not cure."
"Besides, the transfer rates of home births seem to be rising in the Netherlands. They were 40% and 9% for nulliparae and multiparae respectively in 2002. It is also significant that these rates were even higher from polyclinics to hospital: 43% and 19% respectively, as deducted from the enclosed graphs. (The leftmost bars indicate home and polyclinic births and the central ones indicate transfers from home and from polyclinics.)
"Midwives comment that they feel more under pressure to accelerate labour when working closer to "the machines". This observation remains consistent with the conclusions of Wiegers and colleagues comparing midwifery practice at home and in hospitals: Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands (TA. Wiegers, MJNC. Keirse, J. van der Zee, GAH. Berghs). BMJ 1996;313:1309-1313"
The bottom line is that the vast majority of women, especially for first births, benefit from continuous support during labor, not more medical attention.
In addition, you may also find it useful to read CfM's article about ACOG and the AMA here and a discussion of "safety" here.
Sincerely,
Arielle Greenberg Bywater and Susan Hodges
Article Citation:
de Jonge A, van der Goes B, Ravelli A, Amelink-Verburg M, Mol B, Nijhuis J, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Buitendijk S. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009. Accepted 26 February 2009. Published Online 15 April 2009.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare perinatal mortality and severe perinatal morbidity between planned home and planned hospital births, among low-risk women who started their labour in primary care.
Design: A nationwide cohort study.
Setting: The entire Netherlands.
Population: A total of 529 688 low-risk women who were in primary midwife-led care at the onset of labour. Of these, 321 307 (60.7%) intended to give birth at home, 163 261 (30.8%) planned to give birth in hospital and for 45 120 (8.5%), the intended place of birth was unknown.
Methods: Analysis of national perinatal and neonatal registration data, over a period of 7 years. Logistic regression analysis was used to control for differences in baseline characteristics. Main outcome measures Intrapartum death, intrapartum and neonatal death within 24 hours after birth, intrapartum and neonatal death within 7 days and neonatal admission to an intensive care unit.
Results: No significant differences were found between planned home and planned hospital birth (adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals: intrapartum death 0.97 (0.69 to 1.37), intrapartum death and neonatal death during the first 24 hours 1.02 (0.77 to 1.36), intrapartum death and neonatal death up to 7 days 1.00 (0.78 to 1.27), admission to neonatal intensive care unit 1.00 (0.86 to 1.16).
Conclusions: This study shows that planning a home birth does not increase the risks of perinatal mortality and severe perinatal morbidity among low-risk women, provided the maternity care system facilitates this choice through the availability of well-trained midwives and through a good transportation and referral system.
================================================
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Vitamin D and Cesareans
Amy Romano, blogging as a guest on the Giving Birth with Confidence blog, has a really fabulous analysis of the study: Rotating Theories of the Increasing C-section Rate: Vitamin D Edition
Her conclusion is particularly astute:
"Another red flag for bias? One of the study’s four authors is a paid consultant to none other than Quest Diagnostics, the company that made me listen to an ad for vitamin D blood testing while I was on hold.
Debunking this study doesn’t mean that vitamin D deficiency is harmless or that there aren’t other potential public health benefits to preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women. But we need a lot more information before we start blaming the increasing cesarean rate on vitamin D. It’s tempting in the face of a cesarean epidemic to assume that women’s bodies are deficient in something or another, or to just assume that women are asking for it. These theories direct attention away from the systemic problems that keep the cesarean rate marching higher and higher."
Speaking of the Giving Birth with Confidence blog, Amy also has an in-depth post there looking at the new homebirth study from the Netherlands that concluded giving birth at home is at least as safe as giving birth in the hospital. Rixa at Stand and Deliver also has a good post about this homebirth study, including lots of links to the difference media coverage of it. Make sure to check these out!
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Friday, April 17, 2009
Emotional & Physical Impact of Cesareans
Midwifery Today recently published a two part article by Pam Udy. The first article addresses the physical impact of cesareans and the second article addresses the emotional impact of cesareans. As the author notes, a cesarean "can scar her heart, as well as her uterus."
Among a variety of physical effects, "Mothers who have cesareans are less likely to breastfeed, for many reasons. Often mother and baby are separated, which means a delay in getting baby to breast. The mom is dealing with pain, fatigue, possibly stress, and even trauma. The incision itself causes the mom difficulty in finding a comfortable position in which to nurse. The baby may have respiratory issues." You can read an excerpt from the Physical Impact article here.
I particularly enjoyed this quote from the Emotional Impact article (which you can read a longer excerpt from at Midwifery Today):
In the continuum of life, pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period are milestone events. These experiences profoundly affect women, babies, fathers and families. They have important and long-lasting effects on society.
When a woman give birth, she has to reach down inside herself and give more than she thought she had. The limits of her existence are stretched...As she does it, she becomes someone new: a mother. If the birthing process is skipped or occurs in a hostile situation, or if the interventions become overwhelming, she becomes a different mother that she would have been if she had only a supportive, midwifery model of care.
The transition to motherhood is challenging on its own without adding in a host of additional physical and emotional recovery factors. Obviously, we are glad for cesareans when they are necessary, but as a country we can definitely do better than launching so many new mothers into an intense new role while they are simultaneously trying to heal in body and mind.
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Media Assortment
+ A recent Cochrane evidence review came out on Maternal positions and mobility during first stage of labor:
So why would staying out of bed shorten labor and reduce pain?+ I was interested to read the article Abu Dhabi doula about a multicultural doula training conducted by Debra Pascali-Bonaro.
"Women who are upright and mobile are able to change their positions more easily," said Annemarie Lawrence, lead review author and a research midwife at the Institute of Women's and Children's Health at Townsville Hospital in Queensland, Australia.
"The ability to change positions, to utilize a wider variety of positions, and try other options, such as hot showers, birthing balls and beanbag supports, may help reduce overall pain and give women a greater sense of control over the progress of their labor," she said.
+The Sierra Vista Herald published an article about a midwife: Bisbee midwife has assisted at hundreds of births
+ And, the Chicago Tribune weighed in on the Atlantic breastfeeding article I've posted about previously:
Breast-feeding's debate not related to infants' health:--
But the guilt and the angst over whether to breast-feed is her problem, as is her perception that she'll be less than an uber-mom if she gives her baby a bottle. Who told her she had to be an uber-mom, anyway? The reality is, moms make trade-offs over what they do for their babies all the time in light of their time, energy, abilities and financial and emotional resources.
Molly
CfM Blogger
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
BBC Articles
The second was originally published last month: Women 'unprepared for childbirth'. From the article's opener: "Many women are going into labour vastly underestimating how painful it can be and overly optimistic that they will be able to manage without drugs, a study suggests. How has this happened?"
As a childbirth educator, I definitely have lots of thoughts about this. In fact, there is a very telling segment later in the article: "Much evidence suggests, however, that women who are well supported by midwives and partners throughout their labour and made to feel at ease are the ones who manage their pain the most effectively and require the fewest drugs."
My short take on the question "How has this happened?" is that many hospitals simply do not support the six care practices that support normal birth (care practices that greatly add to women's ability to cope with labor) and that women's access to the Midwives Model of Care is very limited!
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Susan Hodges is a Women's Health Hero Nominee!
From OBOS:
"One winner will be chosen by the staff and Our Bodies Ourselves' Board of Directors, while the other winner will be determined by the public through a ratings system located on the contest website. Public voting ends May 8, 2009 and the entry that receives the highest overall ranking will receive the Audience Choice Award. So don't forget to ask friends, family and co-workers to rate your entry. "
--
Molly
CfM Blogger
Monday, April 13, 2009
OBOS Women's Health Heroes
When you hear the words "Women’s Health Hero," who comes to mind? Your 9th grade health teacher who taught you about sexually transmitted infections? The midwife who sat with you through 15 hours of labor? The young Nigerian activist you read about who’s working to end gender discrimination in her country? Or maybe the neighbor who counter-protests at the abortion clinic every Saturday morning?
Whoever your heroes are, we want to know about them! We’ve created the Our Bodies Ourselves Women’s Health Heroes awards to honor those who make significant contributions to the health and well-being of women. It’s a great way to publicly recognize people who make a difference in your life or the lives of others.
Nominations are now being accepted. Please visit http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/heroes.asp for more information.
Contact Wendy Brovold, Communications and Marketing Manager at wendy@bwhbc.org or 617-245-0200x13 with questions.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Grassroots Network: Big Push for Midwives Action Alert
Health Care Reform is coming FAST! We are hearing from multiple sources that bills are being drafted now, for voting during the summer. Therefore, we are forwarding along this Action Alert from The Big Push for Midwives (see below). To find out more about The Big Push for Midwives campaign, visit their site.
A couple of suggestions to add to the Big Push's Action Alert information: First, In approaching your Senator and Representative, consider that "health care reform" is a huge topic, and only 1% of women are giving birth at home. Therefore, start with the bigger picture: the high importance of reforming Maternity Care in order to improve birth outcomes (a problem in the US), lowering costs (inexcusably high in the US), and addressing "Comparative Effectiveness" (the new buzzword for studying what works and what doesn't in health care, for which funds have already been earmarked). CPMs certainly have an important role to play (as noted in the Big Push action alert), but you may be more effective if you start with the "big picture" issues.
Second, in addition to the BigPush FAQ flier linked below, Citizens for Midwifery has material that you may find very useful, for background information, ideas, or in some cases to give to the legislator or include with a letter. Among the many resources on our website, the following may be particularly useful:
CfM's Health Care Reform Recommendations to Obama Transition Team
Out-of-Hospital Midwifery Care: Much Lower Rates of Cesarean Sections for Low-Risk Women
State of American Childbirth--2005 and 2006 Data [note: this is the most recent data available]
And don't forget: if you are not able to personally visit your US Senator or Representative, write a letter! The sooner the better! CfM has some tips for writing letters to legislators. Developed for writing to state legislators, this guide can easily be adapted to this situation, and the basic tips all apply. Find this at:
Anyone Can Write to Their Legislator - It's Easy
Basically, hand write your letter, and keep the letter short and to the point (you can always include an additional fact sheet or two).
Sincerely,
Susan Hodges, "gatekeeper"
****************************************
From The Big Push for Midwives:
Urgent Request for Action!
WASHINGTON Must Hear Direct From Grassroots America
Folks, I have some urgent news to report. PushScouts who have attended White House town-hall health care meetings across the country with policy wonks and DC insiders have all returned with the same message:
Federal health care reform is moving fast and *the window of opportunity for including Certified Professional Midwives is rapidly closing.* Bills are being drafted now and any providers who aren't on "the list" by September
will be left behind.
The time to act is now.
*We need each and every Pusher* to schedule an in-district meeting with their member of Congress and two Senators today. Both chambers are in recess, and members are in their home districts until April 19th. This is a
*golden opportunity* to begin educating our federal representatives about CPMs and to make sure all of us are doing everything we can to *make sure that CPMs are included in the final reform package*.
Scheduling a meeting is easy, but many other groups are competing for face-time and the available *slots are filling up fast.* So please follow the instructions below and *call* your federal delegation today!
*Midwives, please forward this important information to your clients,* past and present, and ask them to schedule a visit with their federal representatives. Also, it's important that CPMs represent their profession at the federal level, so please *pick one or two clients you would like to accompany you to a visit* and ask them to join you.
Attached you will find a two-page FAQ that includes each of the messages your representatives need to hear. You can also download it from the PushSite.
All you need to do in the next week is *1)* pick one or two of your favorite points to talk briefly about, *2)* record any questions they may have that you are unable to answer to pass along for follow-up, *3) *leave the FAQ
sheet with their staff and *4)* report back to other Pushers about your meeting!
Because there is strength in numbers, we ask you to recruit one or two supportive allies to go to the meeting with you: community leaders, local clergy, physicians, nurses or other providers, a neighbor or member of your
family. It is important that our members of the Senate and Congress understand that *access to CPMs is important to Americans from all walks of life,* not just to those of us who choose this model of care or are CPMs ourselves.
*SCHEDULING AN IN-DISTRICT MEETING IS AS EASY AS A-B-C: *
All you need to do is identify your U.S. representative and two U.S. senators and contact them!
A. Use this link to determine your full zip code, which is your ZIP+four code.
B. Use this link and type in your ZIP+four code to determine your U.S. representative.
C. Use this link to determine your two U.S. senators.
Please make the call today! *We have 10 days* until their April recess is over.
Below is a list of tips and pointers to help you plan a smooth and easy visit with your federal representatives. Remember, they work *for you*!
*Tips for Visiting Your Members of Congress in Their District Offices*
§ When you call to make the appointment, be sure to *mention that you are a constituent*, where you live and that you would like to briefly discuss the importance of including Certified Professional Midwives, who are specialists in out-of-hospital birth, in federal health reform.
It may take more than one call to get an appointment. Don't be shy about calling more than once!
§ Meeting with the staff person in charge of health care is every bit as effective as meeting with your member of Congress. Don't be discouraged if your representative can't meet with you—convincing staff that your issue is worthwhile is *a huge step forward* in getting your representative to support you.
§ Take a look at your representatives' web pages and get some background on their issues of interest or any legislation they support that you do, too.
§ *Recruit at least one other person in your community to join you*, but appoint one lead spokesperson for the meeting.
§ Be sure to wear business-casual clothes—no jeans or t-shirts, please!
§ Be considerate of their time. Make sure you keep track of your time and articulate your position without running over your allotted time.
§ After you have briefly made one or two points about the importance of including CPMs in federal health care reform, *ask if they have any questions*.
§ If you don't know the answer to a question, tell them you will pass it along to *The Big Push for Midwives Steering Committee
* for follow up.
§ After you've answered any questions, *ask them if they have a position on CPMs and out-of-hospital birth.* Offer to provide them with more information if they haven't yet taken a position.
§ Even if they are non-committal, *ask them for advice about what you can do to get CPMs included in federal health care reform.* Legislators and staff appreciate being asked to share their expertise and insight about
the legislative process with constituents.
§ It is appropriate to take notes about any questions they may want follow up or about advice they are offering. Save notes on the rest of the discussion for after your meeting.
§ Be sure to leave staff with your contact information and make sure you have theirs.
And of course, please don't forget to thank everyone for their time!
*The Final Push*
After you leave, sit down and conduct a brief review with others at the meeting. Assign someone to take notes and write down any key information or questions such as the legislator/staff's position, questions they have, objections they raised and any advice they offered.
Write legislators and staff after the visit to thank them for their time. Remind them of anything they may have agreed to do and send any additional information they may have requested.
*Report back to The Push Team*!* *Please forward notes and questions to Steff at Steff@TheBigPushForMidwives.org and share your experience, thoughts and tips with others at The Big Push for Midwives Facebook Discussion board.
Don't be shy about staying in touch with legislators and staff with alerts or other relevant news or information about CPMs. Effective advocacy at the legislative level is all about relationships—it's important to start building them now with your federal representatives and their staff.
